<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Clean Energy Sector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleanenergysector.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleanenergysector.com</link>
	<description>Profiting from the Global Energy Transformation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:44:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Success Means for ARPA-E by Brian Hughes Barron</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/03/what-success-means-for-arpa-e/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hughes Barron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=52554#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>Katie: You noted above: &quot;And we won’t be able to determine how good the selection process is for many years to come.&quot;

On the contrary, the transformational technology that will most radically address the growing &quot;Global Weirding&quot; conundrum will have the following:

  **  abundant, ubiquitous, clean, cheap, &amp; accessible feedstock components 

  **  primary &quot;Biomimicry&quot; characterestics that:
          ##  feature closed process loops
          ##  create zero waste of both energy &amp; matter
          ##  create zero toxicity

  **  treat the 60+% of waste heat from our 3+ billion worldwide exothermic   reactors as a resource, not an impending disaster.

Rapid deployment of this transformational technology on an individual, decentralized, stand-alone basis will rapidly convince the remaining world population that the New Hydrogen Economy can become a reality in less than 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie: You noted above: &#8220;And we won’t be able to determine how good the selection process is for many years to come.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the contrary, the transformational technology that will most radically address the growing &#8220;Global Weirding&#8221; conundrum will have the following:</p>
<p>  **  abundant, ubiquitous, clean, cheap, &amp; accessible feedstock components </p>
<p>  **  primary &#8220;Biomimicry&#8221; characterestics that:<br />
          ##  feature closed process loops<br />
          ##  create zero waste of both energy &amp; matter<br />
          ##  create zero toxicity</p>
<p>  **  treat the 60+% of waste heat from our 3+ billion worldwide exothermic   reactors as a resource, not an impending disaster.</p>
<p>Rapid deployment of this transformational technology on an individual, decentralized, stand-alone basis will rapidly convince the remaining world population that the New Hydrogen Economy can become a reality in less than 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Releases API for Energy Tool PowerMeter by elliott</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/03/google-releases-api-for-energy-tool-powermeter/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=52523#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>If you have any questions about the SDK for Hohm feel free to reach out to us on the website or on Facebook and Twitter.

Elliott
Online Community Manager</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have any questions about the SDK for Hohm feel free to reach out to us on the website or on Facebook and Twitter.</p>
<p>Elliott<br />
Online Community Manager</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on V-Vehicle Misses Deadline, Loses Shot at $87M? by Carla Pete</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/03/v-vehicle-misses-deadline-loses-shot-at-87m/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=52473#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>(Please re-post this as a community service)
Less than 20 car companies (The ATVM people say there were tons of applications but only a handful were car companies) applied for $25 BILLION DOLLARS in taxpayer money managed by a certain smug group of people at DOE in order to get loans to make green cars for Americans. This was not all of DOE that did bad things, just a private cadre of men led by Lachland Seward and Matt Rogers and his McKinsey “Partner” who flew back and forth to their homes in Silicon Valley every weekend on the taxpayer dime.

There was enough money to help every single one of the car companies that applied. The administrators applied their interpretations of the law in order to benefit the large lobby group-related firms and avoided every one of the “politically unconnected “independent American companies.

The amount of lobby and influence money spent by each awardee is in direct ratio to the amount of money awarded. Pay-to-play was the process.

The smaller companies, due to lower overhead, could have dramatically more productive results with the money than the large burdened companies yet the money was given out based on political career advantages for the administrators rather than the technology advantages for Americans. 

The way the ATVM people set it up (Google “Siry says stifles innovation” for more), the smaller applicants were prevented from getting outside investor funding.

All of the people that reviewed the applications had political and financial connections to GM, Ford, Chrysler and the large Detroit recipients.

Each of those smaller American companies had technology and resources that presented a powerful economic threat, if they got the loans, to the large politically connected companies that did receive funds. The big car companies wanted the small companies cut-out at all costs.

The Section 136 law was written to provide first-come-first serve funding but when the small companies got their applications in first, while the big ones arrogantly felt that they did not even need to apply because it was already pre-staged for them, the ATVM officials changed the rules in order to remove the first-come-first-serve standard of the law in order to cut out the smaller independents.

Some of the companies that have gotten money have backed out of making the electric cars they said they would make. But they still get to keep the money.

The Section 136 Law was created by the lobbyists for GM, Ford &amp; Chrysler when they saw that they were about to go bankrupt and wanted to tap into additional taxpayer dollars by claiming the money was going to be used for electric cars in order to win rapid support for Section 136 by tugging at heartstrings. In retrospect, the money mostly went to gasoline car projects. Multiple public hearings have already shown the sister loan guarantee program to have been a failed program via intentional delays, the head was fired and replaced &amp; massive complaints have been filed by many.

Some of the companies that got the money have already wasted more money than other companies applied for as their total request.

Some of the companies that got taxpayer loan money are not even American companies and/or are doing their manufacturing offshore with non-American employees. Thus, the ATVM process has cost American&#039;s jobs.

Those who got the money had to fill out little, or no, paperwork, went through little, or no, review and were connected to the DOE people who gave them the money and shepherded them through the process. Those who they wanted to keep out were forced to jump through more hoops, were slow-tracked in review and had made no political deals via hired law and lobby firms that the big companies has used to conduit “influence”.

The decision about who would get money was made in 2008 by a private group who then pretended there was a lengthy review throughout 2009 but in fact, the money was pre-wired for a select few.

All of the things that the rejected small companies (who did not pay lobby fees) were rejected for, were the same things that the insider big companies were doing. In at least two cases, big companies who were in violation of Section 136 rules were guided by reviewer-insiders to change their whole business structure in order to become suddenly “compliant “with section 136 while smaller companies received no such “help”.

How does this affect you? It cost you and your friends jobs, it delayed American innovation, it made your family have to breath toxic petroleum fumes for another decade, it furthered a corrupt practice and it hurt domestic small business. This was all about money. Controlling who got to make money off of the technology and who got to delay electric cars so the old oil and steel guys could still make money off of their old assets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Please re-post this as a community service)<br />
Less than 20 car companies (The ATVM people say there were tons of applications but only a handful were car companies) applied for $25 BILLION DOLLARS in taxpayer money managed by a certain smug group of people at DOE in order to get loans to make green cars for Americans. This was not all of DOE that did bad things, just a private cadre of men led by Lachland Seward and Matt Rogers and his McKinsey “Partner” who flew back and forth to their homes in Silicon Valley every weekend on the taxpayer dime.</p>
<p>There was enough money to help every single one of the car companies that applied. The administrators applied their interpretations of the law in order to benefit the large lobby group-related firms and avoided every one of the “politically unconnected “independent American companies.</p>
<p>The amount of lobby and influence money spent by each awardee is in direct ratio to the amount of money awarded. Pay-to-play was the process.</p>
<p>The smaller companies, due to lower overhead, could have dramatically more productive results with the money than the large burdened companies yet the money was given out based on political career advantages for the administrators rather than the technology advantages for Americans. </p>
<p>The way the ATVM people set it up (Google “Siry says stifles innovation” for more), the smaller applicants were prevented from getting outside investor funding.</p>
<p>All of the people that reviewed the applications had political and financial connections to GM, Ford, Chrysler and the large Detroit recipients.</p>
<p>Each of those smaller American companies had technology and resources that presented a powerful economic threat, if they got the loans, to the large politically connected companies that did receive funds. The big car companies wanted the small companies cut-out at all costs.</p>
<p>The Section 136 law was written to provide first-come-first serve funding but when the small companies got their applications in first, while the big ones arrogantly felt that they did not even need to apply because it was already pre-staged for them, the ATVM officials changed the rules in order to remove the first-come-first-serve standard of the law in order to cut out the smaller independents.</p>
<p>Some of the companies that have gotten money have backed out of making the electric cars they said they would make. But they still get to keep the money.</p>
<p>The Section 136 Law was created by the lobbyists for GM, Ford &amp; Chrysler when they saw that they were about to go bankrupt and wanted to tap into additional taxpayer dollars by claiming the money was going to be used for electric cars in order to win rapid support for Section 136 by tugging at heartstrings. In retrospect, the money mostly went to gasoline car projects. Multiple public hearings have already shown the sister loan guarantee program to have been a failed program via intentional delays, the head was fired and replaced &amp; massive complaints have been filed by many.</p>
<p>Some of the companies that got the money have already wasted more money than other companies applied for as their total request.</p>
<p>Some of the companies that got taxpayer loan money are not even American companies and/or are doing their manufacturing offshore with non-American employees. Thus, the ATVM process has cost American&#8217;s jobs.</p>
<p>Those who got the money had to fill out little, or no, paperwork, went through little, or no, review and were connected to the DOE people who gave them the money and shepherded them through the process. Those who they wanted to keep out were forced to jump through more hoops, were slow-tracked in review and had made no political deals via hired law and lobby firms that the big companies has used to conduit “influence”.</p>
<p>The decision about who would get money was made in 2008 by a private group who then pretended there was a lengthy review throughout 2009 but in fact, the money was pre-wired for a select few.</p>
<p>All of the things that the rejected small companies (who did not pay lobby fees) were rejected for, were the same things that the insider big companies were doing. In at least two cases, big companies who were in violation of Section 136 rules were guided by reviewer-insiders to change their whole business structure in order to become suddenly “compliant “with section 136 while smaller companies received no such “help”.</p>
<p>How does this affect you? It cost you and your friends jobs, it delayed American innovation, it made your family have to breath toxic petroleum fumes for another decade, it furthered a corrupt practice and it hurt domestic small business. This was all about money. Controlling who got to make money off of the technology and who got to delay electric cars so the old oil and steel guys could still make money off of their old assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 50 Hottest Companies in Bioenergy for 2009-10: #14, Range Fuels by Broken Promises from Range Fuels &#124; Energy Stocks Blog</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/01/50-hottest-companies-in-bioenergy-for-2009-10-14-range-fuels/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Broken Promises from Range Fuels &#124; Energy Stocks Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2010/01/05/50-hottest-companies-in-bioenergy-for-2009-10-14-range-fuels/#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>[...] to do. One pattern that started to emerge was that they referred less to cellulosic ethanol and more to cellulosic biofuels. This was significant, because I had always maintained that it wouldn&#8217;t be cost-competitive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to do. One pattern that started to emerge was that they referred less to cellulosic ethanol and more to cellulosic biofuels. This was significant, because I had always maintained that it wouldn&#8217;t be cost-competitive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloom Energy to Unveil the Bloom Box on “60 Minutes,” Sunday by Greg Thomas</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/02/bloom-energy-to-unveil-the-bloom-box-on-%e2%80%9c60-minutes%e2%80%9d-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=51785#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>How do I get hold of Bloom Energy??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I get hold of Bloom Energy??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Big Shift: Four Principles for the shift from a fossil fuel based society by Andy</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/02/the-big-shift-four-principles-for-the-shift-from-a-fossil-fuel-based-society/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:feeds2.feedburner.com://2523d6dd282d18b8d55424b051fb3f21#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Bullet point 2 is a very nice one for all protectionists all over the world that want to prevent a development of the world. Sub-Saharan Africa can free some 500 Mha for biofuels - still retaining their food production capacity. We shouldn&#039;t block their possibility to develop an income-generating industry out of this - that would just cement the unjustices in the world.

Let&#039;s instead work with openess, labelling and certification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullet point 2 is a very nice one for all protectionists all over the world that want to prevent a development of the world. Sub-Saharan Africa can free some 500 Mha for biofuels &#8211; still retaining their food production capacity. We shouldn&#8217;t block their possibility to develop an income-generating industry out of this &#8211; that would just cement the unjustices in the world.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s instead work with openess, labelling and certification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iogen gets top rating in Lux Research advanced biofuels report by Charles</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/02/iogen-gets-top-rating-in-lux-research-advanced-biofuels-report/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:feeds2.feedburner.com://2306f097196e9c7525cd0f439468636b#comment-959</guid>
		<description>With global warming now proven to be a scam beyond any doubt, there is no need for further investment in biofuels so long as they remain an order of magnitude more expensive than cheap fossil fuels. 

Time to ditch the green tech bubble. It is bursting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With global warming now proven to be a scam beyond any doubt, there is no need for further investment in biofuels so long as they remain an order of magnitude more expensive than cheap fossil fuels. </p>
<p>Time to ditch the green tech bubble. It is bursting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iogen gets top rating in Lux Research advanced biofuels report by Mike</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/02/iogen-gets-top-rating-in-lux-research-advanced-biofuels-report/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:feeds2.feedburner.com://2306f097196e9c7525cd0f439468636b#comment-954</guid>
		<description>The Biofuel industry has had positive impacts to the AG sector in this country, along with many benefits to the people in regards to health and welfare. The Federal Conservatives are in step with the desire of this nation to remain a leader in innovative technologies that improve our lives as a nation. Good Job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Biofuel industry has had positive impacts to the AG sector in this country, along with many benefits to the people in regards to health and welfare. The Federal Conservatives are in step with the desire of this nation to remain a leader in innovative technologies that improve our lives as a nation. Good Job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iogen gets top rating in Lux Research advanced biofuels report by Durward</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/02/iogen-gets-top-rating-in-lux-research-advanced-biofuels-report/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Durward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:feeds2.feedburner.com://2306f097196e9c7525cd0f439468636b#comment-948</guid>
		<description>Blah blah blah, shut it down!
Biofuels are an atrocity and are totally inefficient, gum up engines and steal food off the world plate.
A disgusting enterprise that only exists by subsidies and fear mongering a lie.
Harper this was a mistake shut it down!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blah blah blah, shut it down!<br />
Biofuels are an atrocity and are totally inefficient, gum up engines and steal food off the world plate.<br />
A disgusting enterprise that only exists by subsidies and fear mongering a lie.<br />
Harper this was a mistake shut it down!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fixing the Broken Government Policy Process by Christian Lutz</title>
		<link>http://cleanenergysector.com/2010/02/fixing-the-broken-government-policy-process/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Lutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:rss.sciam.com://4c24360316276699dd36727f01347731#comment-916</guid>
		<description>That seems to me a very good analysis of the actual situation worldwide. Decisions are made by politicians under the stress of being influenced by hundreds of lobbying industry consultants fixing their claims for the future - thats not really an energy revolution...
In Germany we actually find ourselves in confrontation with an energy lobby, which likes to rolls back history to the roots of German energy industry... - nuclear right in front. One problem is the fact, that this technology causes immense costs in the future - even if its no longer used. I can see similar influence in the decisions of your government.
In fact theres no way going back - and we must find solutions for all the problems left in the near future... worldwide.
I would like to wish you good luck for turning the things in the right direction!
Christian Lutz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems to me a very good analysis of the actual situation worldwide. Decisions are made by politicians under the stress of being influenced by hundreds of lobbying industry consultants fixing their claims for the future &#8211; thats not really an energy revolution&#8230;<br />
In Germany we actually find ourselves in confrontation with an energy lobby, which likes to rolls back history to the roots of German energy industry&#8230; &#8211; nuclear right in front. One problem is the fact, that this technology causes immense costs in the future &#8211; even if its no longer used. I can see similar influence in the decisions of your government.<br />
In fact theres no way going back &#8211; and we must find solutions for all the problems left in the near future&#8230; worldwide.<br />
I would like to wish you good luck for turning the things in the right direction!<br />
Christian Lutz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.099 seconds -->
